010 votes · 0 published
18-team CFP
Is an 18-team playoff the best field?
The proposal uses 18 to create four earned paths: double bye, bowl entry, campus host, and road entry.
Vote, then explain your answer →The public workshop
Start a thread.
Test the idea.
Everything is public to read. A profile is needed only to post in this moderated college-football forum: vote on a creator question, open a discussion, reply to another fan, or jump into the debate attached to a policy.
Pick a sideMake the caseRespect the room
0public threads
0published replies
9proposal rooms
24hposting interval
Started by the creator
Four questions
worth arguing about.
These are editorial prompts, not invented reader posts. Cards rise with real votes and published discussion activity. Each browser gets one vote per question.
020 votes · 0 published
Conference championships
Should five conference champions receive CFP access?
The central tradeoff is national access versus reserving every place strictly for the highest-ranked teams.
Vote, then explain your answer →030 votes · 0 published
18-team CFP
Where should the opening rounds be played?
The proposed field combines four campus openers with a six-bowl Round of 12 instead of choosing only campuses or bowls.
Vote, then explain your answer →040 votes · 0 published
Conference championships
How much should a title-game loss hurt?
A team that earned an extra game should face real consequences without being punished as if every résumé had the same opportunity.
Vote, then explain your answer →Popular discussions
What readers are
talking about.
Popularity is ranked transparently by published response count, then recent activity. There are no invented posts, hidden promotion, or fake engagement totals.
The first public thread has not been approved yet.
The forum will show real reader discussions here as soon as moderation approves them. Empty space is more honest than seeded activity.
Start the first threadNewest threads
Fresh arguments,
in one feed.
Every published item passed the same moderation standards. Approval addresses safety and relevance—not whether the contribution agrees with the proposal.
Newly approved threads will appear here.
Proposal rooms
Discuss the rule
you care about.
Each policy chapter has a dedicated forum. The same room also appears inside that proposal chapter, so readers can move between the rule and its debate without losing context.
Does the complete system hold together?
Discuss the interaction among access, incentives, scheduling, calendar protection, bowls, and governance.
Open Overall framework →Is 18 the right field—and is the path fair?
Test the four competitive bands, campus games, reseeding, earned byes, and championship access.
Open 18-team CFP →How should championship participation be rewarded?
Debate title-game protection, champion access, format choice, and the value of qualifying.
Open Conference titles →Can a separate non-Power Four title create real value?
Examine categorical eligibility, tournament identity, campus hosting, scheduling, and CFP-qualifier protection.
Open National Tournament →What should the committee have to explain?
Develop the résumé standard, public evidence, committee discretion, recusal rules, and review process.
Open Rankings & selection →How do we improve schedules without flattening tradition?
Discuss opponent-quality expectations, interconference inventory, campus games, and rivalry protection.
Open Scheduling & rivalries →How can the postseason be protected without trapping people?
Test transfer windows, signing, coaching movement, lawful exceptions, hardship relief, and enforcement.
Open Roster calendar →What does a legitimate athlete-rights framework require?
Discuss contracts, agents, disclosure, due process, representation, revenue protection, and mobility.
Open NIL & athlete rights →Can the inventory fund the obligations it creates?
Pressure-test rights value, travel and host costs, athlete funding, distributions, and downside protection.
Open Economics & media →Community pulse
What should be tested next?
Choose up to three priorities. These voluntary, anonymous signals help shape future research; they are not a scientific poll.
Create or update my fan profileOpen to readEvery approved thread and reply is public without an account.
One per dayEach signed-in account can contribute once every 24 hours.
ModeratedThreads and replies are reviewed before publication.
Private accountYour sign-in email and account identifier are never displayed publicly.
Build a fan profile
Your team is public.
Your account data is not.
Members choose a display name, favorite team, and perspective. Sign-in email, optional phone, and account identifiers are stored privately for integrity and moderation, are never displayed on threads, and are not sold. Phone is not required for sign-in or posting.