From proposal to operating system

Design first.
Power last.

No page on this site authorizes automatic adoption. The model becomes real only after its legal foundation, athlete representation, funding, competitive effects, operational machinery, and failure conditions are tested in public.

3connected systems
4controlled phases
7launch gates

One implementation map

Nothing launches
on its own island.

A playoff changes workload and value. Agreements change transfer timing. Eligibility changes roster planning. Enforcement authority determines whether any national rule is real.

01

The Game

Calendar inventory, workload, hosts, media value, rankings, access, and competition rules.

Open the system
02

The Market

Player rights, agreements, compensation, NIL, agents, movement, recruiting, rosters, and eligibility.

Open the system
03

The Government

Jurisdiction, enforcement, integrity, independent judgment, appeals, stable rules, and amendment authority.

Open the system

Controlled adoption

Four phases.
No skipped foundation.

Each phase produces public artifacts, identifies the authority responsible for approval, and preserves a stop condition before the next phase begins.

01Foundation

Design the authority

Complete the national authority map, player-rights code, agreement standard, legal and labor analysis, financial model, evidence record, and failure conditions before asking anyone to adopt the system.

  • Rulemaker and decision-rights chart
  • Player-rights and responsibilities code
  • Legal, labor, antitrust, and employment analysis
  • Financial downside and athlete-funding model
02Nonbinding test

Pilot the machinery

Operate the systems that can be tested without coercive power: rankings, calendars, disclosures, sample agreements, case clocks, conflict screens, and public audits.

  • Historical and live shadow ranking runs
  • Agreement and disclosure prototypes
  • Mock eligibility and integrity dockets
  • Independent public pilot scorecard
03Authority before launch

Negotiate the foundation

Secure every power the model actually needs through collective bargaining, legislation, contractual accession, provider agreements, conference action, CFP action, NFL coordination, or another lawful mechanism.

  • Athlete representation and bargaining path
  • Conference, CFP, NCAA, and school accession
  • College Football–NFL calendar compact
  • Independent tribunal funding and appointment terms
04Future effective date

Transition by cycle

Launch only after the current season ends, with published grandfathering for eligibility, agreements, rosters, disclosures, and sanctions. Audit the first cycle and keep an exit path if the gates fail.

  • Entering-class and contract grandfather rules
  • Preseason competitive-rule lock
  • First-cycle compliance and welfare audit
  • Sunset, amendment, and withdrawal process

Launch standard

Seven gates.
A failed gate stops the launch.

“In progress” is not a softer version of “passed.” Independent reviewers should be able to reject, amend, delay, or narrow the system.

  1. 01

    Legal authority

    The actual source of power for every market restriction, national standard, investigative demand, and sanction is written and independently reviewed.

    Open
  2. 02

    Athlete representation

    Direct athlete representatives participate in the design, negotiation, administration, review, and amendment of rights and obligations.

    Open
  3. 03

    Athlete welfare

    Health, insurance, travel, recovery, academic, family-assistance, data, and post-eligibility obligations are funded before discretionary distributions.

    Open
  4. 04

    Financial durability

    Rights value, provider costs, downside cases, institutional burdens, and protected funding are modeled with credible inputs.

    Open
  5. 05

    Competitive validation

    The CFP, National Tournament, schedule, ranking model, championship protections, and roster calendar survive historical and live shadow testing.

    Open
  6. 06

    Operational readiness

    Potential hosts certify staffing, lodging, winter readiness, student access, and funded contingencies before selection, then test short-notice activation and the neutral fallback. Schools, officials, broadcasters, technology vendors, case administrators, and appeals panels must also pass their operating checks.

    How to test short-notice hosting

    Proposed test · not yet run. A written plan is not proof that a campus can deliver. Publish the criteria before the rehearsal and have an independent reviewer check the results.

    Before the season
    The proposed organizer and potential hosts set the same readiness standards, decision deadlines, and relocation rules. Test different campus sizes, winter conditions, and academic calendars—not just the easiest venue.
    Before selection
    Campus and local operations teams document paid staffing, security, medical cover, lodging, transport, field readiness, and student access. Identify who pays for unused reservations and cancellation costs.
    When a team advances
    Run a timed rehearsal using the proposed turnaround. Confirm actual supplier availability and visiting-team travel, then record activation time, staff gaps, cost, student access, and recovery conflicts.
    If readiness fails
    Rehearse the neutral fallback with the same travel and recovery checks. Publish the failed requirement, decision owner, notification timing, and added cost. An unfunded or unworkable fallback means the test has not passed.

    Keep this gate open until the evidence meets the published criteria. If it fails, change the operating plan or calendar and test again.

    Open the host responsibility worksheet and two example cases →
    Back to the playoff hosting questions
    Open
  7. 07

    Public accountability

    Assumptions, pilot results, failed gates, amendments, conflicts, tribunal decisions, and annual audits remain visible in a durable public record.

    Open

The right first move

Pilot information before coercive power.

The safest early work is visible and reversible: a shadow calendar, ranking backtests, standard-form agreement drafting, anonymized case simulations, conflict checks, disclosure prototypes, and a published scorecard.

A pilot does not create eligibility authority, bind an athlete, validate a market restraint, or imply NCAA, CFP, conference, school, NFL, NFLPA, or labor approval.

Review current gate status Read the adoption chapter

Current decision

Authorize design, negotiation, and testing—not automatic adoption.

Begin with the authority map and athlete representation while continuing the College Football–NFL calendar work. No market, eligibility, contract, or enforcement rule should be treated as binding until the source of lawful power is clear.

Open governance inside the proposal Review College Football–NFL coordination