Browse all 17 chapters
Quick chapter answers
Proposed rulesWhat is this proposal trying to change?
Three connected systems: how teams compete, how athletes move and are paid, and who writes and enforces national rules. Better regular-season finishes should earn better postseason paths.
What stays local?
Conferences keep their identity, rivalries and scheduling choices within a shared national floor. National standards apply where consistent competition and athlete protections require them.
How is a reform judged?
A better finish must earn a better postseason benefit. Every eligible FBS team keeps a CFP route, and market activity should not destabilize championship season.
How it works & full rules
Use one test for every reform: does it reward winning, preserve an FBS path, protect campus football, and keep unrelated market activity out of championship season?
Why change is needed
College football often fixes one problem at a time. The result can expand access while weakening the regular season, protect tradition while hiding favoritism, or create player freedom without reliable rules.
Why this approach
These principles are a consistency check. A later rule cannot call itself reform if it produces a ranking position teams would rather avoid or changes the competitive population during the season.
How it works
- Every eligible FBS team keeps a route to the CFP, and every better finish must earn a better postseason benefit.
- National rules use institutional categories and published standards—not the name, conference brand, or television value of a school.
- Market freedom is the default; restrictions must identify the harm they prevent and take effect prospectively.
The tradeoff
A common national floor limits some local discretion. The proposal therefore standardizes only what must be shared and leaves rivalries, conference identity, scheduling choices, and lawful compensation strategy local.
In practice
If finishing No. 5 creates an easier route than finishing No. 4, the bracket fails before anyone debates which schools received those seeds.
The complete rule set
What this part would establish
- Every eligible FBS institution retains a path to the CFP.
- No institution should prefer the ranking position directly below it.
- A required conference championship appearance should create opportunity, not disproportionate downside.
- Official decisions must separate what a team earned from a prediction of how good it is now.
- Conferences retain identity and scheduling authority inside shared national participation standards.
- Economic freedom and player mobility remain the default; national restrictions must protect a defined competitive or contractual need.
- Material competitive rules publish before the season and ordinarily take effect in the following cycle rather than changing during championship competition.
Detailed mechanics
Keep one ecosystem
The complementary National Tournament does not create a new subdivision or close the CFP to institutions outside the Power Four. It adds a second meaningful objective while preserving the CFP as the only FBS national-championship path.
Make every position consequential
The postseason is organized into four benefit bands: double bye, single bye, opening-round home game, and opening-round road game. That creates a continuous incentive to improve rather than one qualification cliff followed by nearly identical paths.
Use institutional categories, not named teams
The implementing rulebook would define conference members and independents by affiliation for the season rather than embedding individual institutions. An independent remains an independent regardless of reputation, media value, schedule, or a separate postseason agreement.
- Season classification is based on football membership on the preceding July 1.
- Power Four status attaches to a conference holding designated access and champion-bye rights in the CFP agreement.
- A change in designation ordinarily requires two seasons of notice.
Protect tradition through incentives
The proposal does not try to standardize colors, rivalries, conferences, bands, or campus identity. It standardizes the national incentives that currently reward weak scheduling, punish extra competition, or push roster-market activity into championship season.
Free markets where possible
Players may earn legitimate market compensation, choose flexible or longer agreements, use professional representation, and move when contractually free. The national rulebook regulates conduct—fraud, tampering, gambling, undisclosed conflicts, broken agreements, and competitive cheating—rather than assigning a central price to talent.
Protect competitive certainty
Eligibility, roster, transfer, recruiting, compensation-disclosure, and postseason rules should be settled before the season begins. Courts retain their lawful authority, but the sport should reduce emergency in-season litigation through clear jurisdiction, prospective effective dates, fast internal review, and legally tested rules.
Current proposal answers
Decisions already made.
These are policy calls—not claims that outside approval or validation already exists.Which national standards are essential, and which decisions should remain entirely local?
The national floor covers eligibility, athlete rights, agreement standards, market windows, integrity, due process, health and safety, ranking disclosure, and postseason access. Conferences and schools keep scheduling formats, rivalries, compensation strategy, coaching, facilities, and local operations unless those choices conflict with that floor.
How should the system respond if conference structure changes dramatically before launch?
Conference designations are functional, not permanent brand entitlements. Before each season the governing body publishes which conferences meet the proposal’s membership, scheduling, and championship criteria; structural change triggers a prospective public review, not a midseason rewrite.
Safeguards
What keeps the rule honest
- No permanent list of favored institutions appears in the rulebook.
- Conference authority remains intact except where national participation requires a common standard.
- Every later change must be tested against these principles before adoption.
- Every national restriction must name the harm it prevents, the right it limits, and the review date on which it expires or is renewed.
Evidence still required
What outside proof must answer
- What formal amendment threshold should govern a future change in conference designation?
- Which market and eligibility rules require collective bargaining, federal legislation, or another durable legal foundation?
Discuss this chapter
Community
Discuss this chapter.
Ask a question or suggest a change. Threads also appear in Community; sign in to post.