Browse all 17 chapters
Quick chapter answers
Proposed rulesDoes every conference champion get a CFP bid?
No. Five selected champions receive CFP access and at least one bye in this proposal. Every league champion can earn the model’s 2.5% champion component; that component is not itself a bid.
What does a title win add?
The win counts in the record, opponent evidence and game control, alongside the champion component. A win over a ranked opponent also supplies quality-win evidence.
Is a championship-game loss ignored?
No. The loss remains real, but a bounded severity curve and half the ordinary additional-loss frequency treatment recognize the exposure of a required extra game.
How it works & full rules
Make Championship Saturday mostly upside: reward the title distinctly, count the win normally, and keep a required extra-game loss real but less punitive than an ordinary loss.
Why change is needed
A team can earn an extra high-level game and risk losing a path already secured over twelve games, while an idle competitor faces no comparable exposure. That makes participation feel like a penalty.
Why this approach
The model recognizes both accomplishment and extra exposure without inventing conference-specific multipliers. The five-champion CFP access rule remains separate from the ranking component awarded to every league champion.
How it works
- A title win changes the record, opponent evidence, and game-control evidence; beating a Top-25 opponent also counts as a quality win.
- Every league champion receives the same binary Conference Champion component, worth 2.5% of the weighted NRR measures.
- A title loss receives no quality-loss credit, but uses a bounded severity curve and half the ordinary additional-loss frequency treatment.
The tradeoff
Protection is not immunity. A poor title-game performance can still lower the final résumé, and fixed bye capacities can force a published priority rule when claims overlap.
In practice
A champion beating a Top-10 opponent gains a win, quality-win evidence, game-control evidence, and the 2.5% champion component. The runner-up keeps the loss, but the required thirteenth game is not treated like an ordinary missed opportunity.
The complete rule set
What this part would establish
- An official post-regular-season ranking is published after rivalry week.
- A conference-title win enters the résumé like every other win: it changes the record, opponent evidence, and game-control record, and qualifies as a public quality win when the opponent is inside the national Top 25.
- Every league champion receives a binary 100 Conference Champion component weighted at 2.5% of NRR; a runner-up receives no partial champion score.
- A title-game loss stays in the record and receives no quality-loss credit, but NRR applies a bounded severity curve and half ordinary loss-frequency treatment to the required extra game.
- A required title-game participant also keeps the playoff benefit attached to its post-regular-season ranking band, subject to the fixed bracket capacities.
- The five selected conference champions receive CFP berths and at least a single bye; this access rule is separate from the NRR component awarded to every league champion.
- Fixed two-double-bye and eight-single-bye capacities always remain in force.
Detailed mechanics
One result, four visible effects
If a team wins its conference championship against a Top-25 opponent, the result adds a win to its record, enters the Quality-Win Depth evidence curve, contributes its actual game-control evidence, and activates the binary Conference Champion measure. That measure is worth 2.5% of the weighted résumé before the universal record foundation and published Index scaling; it is not a manual 2.5-place jump.
Reduced downside—not immunity
If that team loses, the loss still appears in its record and can still lower its final NRR. The model gives no points for a quality loss. It instead limits the extra exposure with one smooth title-loss severity curve, half ordinary loss-frequency treatment, partial record-side protection, and 60% of the normal repeat-opponent charge when the game is a rematch. A close title loss therefore costs less than an equivalent ordinary loss, while a poor title-game performance still matters.
The separate playoff-path protection
Before title games, the committee publishes the ranking that identifies each participant’s minimum path. Nos. 1–2 claim a double bye, Nos. 3–10 a single bye, Nos. 11–14 a home opener, and Nos. 15–18 a berth. The final result can improve the team’s order, but the required extra game alone cannot erase that minimum benefit. A team outside the field has no protected berth and can still earn its way in by winning.
Capacity reconciliation
Protection cannot manufacture an extra bye. Double-bye slots first protect qualifying title-game participants in the top two; any unprotected slot follows the final ranking. The five selected champions fill the single-bye group first, followed by protected top-ten title participants and then remaining teams in final résumé order until all eight slots are filled.
What winning adds
The scoring and access rules do different jobs. NRR gives every league champion the same binary component, without a conference multiplier. The CFP then selects five champions for access and at least one bye, including the required champion from outside the Power Four. An elite champion remains eligible for a double bye through the ordinary résumé order.
Conference autonomy and game load
Conferences keep control of the way they crown a champion. A league can consider a four-team internal playoff only if it shortens the affected regular-season path. No conference should add postseason rounds without accounting for the national maximum workload.
Current proposal answers
Decisions already made.
These are policy calls—not claims that outside approval or validation already exists.Should any protection depend on a minimum regular-season ranking or win standard?
Yes. A protection claim applies only inside the published CFP qualification bands and never converts an otherwise unqualified team into an at-large selection. Winning the title can secure defined access; merely appearing cannot erase the résumé floor.
How should a conference cancellation or opponent withdrawal affect a protected claim?
A no-fault cancellation preserves the participant’s earned claim. A voluntary withdrawal or adjudicated forfeit can remove it, with the replacement and appeal rules published before the season.
Safeguards
What keeps the rule honest
- Protection applies only to a team required to play an additional championship contest.
- The game may still affect final order; the loss remains visible and protection is not immunity from consequences.
- No school, conference, or championship brand receives a special multiplier or manual override.
- The public model must show the champion component and each title-game win or loss contribution separately.
- The provisional capacity hierarchy must survive at least ten seasons of simulation before adoption.
Evidence still required
What outside proof must answer
- Is the provisional single-bye priority order the fairest way to resolve an over-capacity season?
Discuss this chapter
Community
Discuss this chapter.
Ask a question or suggest a change. Threads also appear in Community; sign in to post.